» Search forum


Index :: BAM! General :: Project Voting idea.


Pages: [1]
John McLeod VII
 
BAM!ID: 23
Joined: 2006-02-27
Posts: 171
Credits: 19,000,102
World-rank: 36,134

2010-02-01 15:04:52

You have a very detailed project vote from each user burried in the resource share allcation specified. You could just use this scaled so that the sum was 100 instead of the current mechanism for voting. With 60+ projects, restricting the vote to 10 seems a bit silly to me.


BOINC WIKI
Saenger
 
Tester - Translator
BAM!ID: 5
Joined: 2006-01-10
Posts: 1735
Credits: 231,763,439
World-rank: 6,769

2010-02-03 07:03:09


Good idea, every time I look there (once in a while) I'm a bit confused whether I shuld vote for more projects or more for the best ones.
10 is definitely too little.
Grüße vom Sänger
DoctorNow
    Donator
Volunteer tester
BAM!ID: 261
Joined: 2006-05-12
Posts: 353
Credits: 2,505,392,719
World-rank: 1,183

2010-02-03 17:07:32

Count me in, I always wondered how I should divide the points appropiately...
BOINC@Heidelberg & BOINC Confederation-member

My BOINCstats/[url=http://signature.statseb.fr/sig-335.png]My badges
[BOINCstats] Willy
 
Forum moderator - Administrator - Developer - Tester - Translator
BAM!ID: 1
Joined: 2006-01-09
Posts: 9461
Credits: 353,172,950
World-rank: 5,070

2010-02-06 13:34:37

I changed the ranking to:

  • take the resource shares (RS) assigned by the user
  • remove the RS of projects which don't active hosts assigned
  • calculate total RS
  • calculate the percentage of the total for each project -> this goes into the grand total



Top 6 remains unchanged from the user ranked list. For those with access to the beta test site, the new list is online there undre project ranking.

I also changed the old ranking:
max points is not 100 total, 10 per project.

Should be keep both lists, or only the new one?

Please do not PM, IM or email me for support (they will go unread/ignored). Use the forum for support.
magyarficko
 
BAM!ID: 76666
Joined: 2009-10-30
Posts: 619
Credits: 287,367,952
World-rank: 5,841

2010-02-06 14:13:29

John McLeod VII wrote:
... the current mechanism for voting. With 60+ projects, restricting the vote to 10 seems a bit silly to me.


What are you guy talking about? Where is this? Link please!


Guest

2010-02-06 14:41:27

magyarficko wrote:
John McLeod VII wrote:
... the current mechanism for voting. With 60+ projects, restricting the vote to 10 seems a bit silly to me.


What are you guy talking about? Where is this? Link please!



in your BAM!-menu - project rating.
Guest

2010-02-06 14:43:30

BOINCstats Willy wrote:
I changed the ranking to:


would a good idea to also get rid of the dead projects on that list..
BAM!ID: 64136
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 0
Credits: 0
World-rank: 0

2010-02-06 15:31:39
last modified: 2010-02-06 15:32:31

What's up with users who have not attached their hosts to BAM! and thus have not changed the default resource share of 100?

What's up with non-cpu intensive projects like FreeHAL, Anansi and DynaPing where the resource share have no influence on the required work?
A share of 1 or 10000 have the same effect on asking new work, but will influence the project popularity.
[BOINCstats] Willy
 
Forum moderator - Administrator - Developer - Tester - Translator
BAM!ID: 1
Joined: 2006-01-09
Posts: 9461
Credits: 353,172,950
World-rank: 5,070

2010-02-06 15:33:36

That's right. But both methods have there flaws.

With the new method users have to attach hosts to BAM! and yes, resource share has no influence on non-CPU/GPU-intensive projects.

Ideas?
Please do not PM, IM or email me for support (they will go unread/ignored). Use the forum for support.
BAM!ID: 64136
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 0
Credits: 0
World-rank: 0

2010-02-06 15:47:24

BOINCstats Willy wrote:
That's right. But both methods have there flaws.

With the new method users have to attach hosts to BAM! and yes, resource share has no influence on non-CPU/GPU-intensive projects.

Ideas?

Not really, but IMO it's not a good idea to discard the users opinion with a BAM!-account, but without attached hosts.
You could make it clear that the resource share is also used for project popularity without using the Account Manager.
[BOINCstats] Willy
 
Forum moderator - Administrator - Developer - Tester - Translator
BAM!ID: 1
Joined: 2006-01-09
Posts: 9461
Credits: 353,172,950
World-rank: 5,070

2010-02-06 15:50:27

Crystal Pellet wrote:
You could make it clear that the resource share is also used for project popularity without using the Account Manager.


Well, you have to use the account manager, otherwise you don't have attached hosts (that BAM! knows of)
Please do not PM, IM or email me for support (they will go unread/ignored). Use the forum for support.
Pages: [1]

Index :: BAM! General :: Project Voting idea.
Reason: